The Cost of Daylight Saving Time on Our Health (and our GDP)

Every March and October, millions of Britons dutifully adjust their clocks, participating in a century-old ritual that feels as British as queueing or discussing the weather.

Yet few realise that this seemingly innocuous habit, daylight saving time (DST), carries a hefty price tag of approximately £300 million annually, along with significant consequences for our health and longevity.

As our population ages and healthcare systems strain under growing pressure, perhaps it's time to question whether this wartime relic still deserves its place in modern society.

The Outdated Origins: From Coal Conservation to Modern Confusion

Daylight saving time emerged during the darkness of World War I, when resources were scarce and every coal lump counted. Germany first implemented the practice in 1916 as a practical solution to extend productive daylight hours while conserving energy.

Britain quickly followed suit, and what began as a temporary wartime measure gradually became an entrenched tradition.

"Daylight saving is a brilliant campaign of advertising, not the least adroit part of which consists in its enlisting that truly British joy in being regimented and in doing what one is told to do." — Sir Josiah Stamp, economist, writing in 1918

The post-war justifications evolved: more daylight for after-work leisure, reduced crime during lighter evenings, and energy savings during peak hours. Yet the evidence for these benefits has grown increasingly tenuous in our 24/7, electrically illuminated world.

A Timeline of Controversy

• 1916: UK adopts DST during WWI as the Summer Time Act
• 1940-1945: Britain operates on "Double Summer Time" during WWII
• 1968-1971: UK experiments with permanent British Standard Time, abandoned after Scottish opposition
• 2012: UK Parliament debates abolishing DST, but concerns about Scotland's darker mornings prevail
• 2019: European Parliament votes to end mandatory DST by 2021, but Brexit removes UK from this agreement
• 2023: Multiple parliamentary questions raised about health impacts, yet no policy change

The persistence of DST represents a curious case where policy inertia trumps mounting scientific evidence. While the EU has moved toward abandoning the practice, Brexit has left Britain in temporal limbo, neither advancing toward reform nor definitely committing to the status quo.

The Financial Toll: Why DST Costs the UK £300 Million Every Year

The economic burden of daylight saving time transitions extends far beyond the minor inconvenience of adjusting timepieces.

The University of Surrey's comprehensive 2022 analysis broke down the costs:

Impact Area	Estimated Annual Cost	Key Factors
Workplace productivity	£187 million	Reduced concentration, fatigue-related errors, increased absenteeism
Transportation accidents	£45 million	12% spike in collisions, insurance claims, emergency response
Healthcare surges	£38 million	Heart attack admissions, fall injuries, mental health episodes
Energy usage	£30 million	Morning heating demand offsets evening savings

For the average Briton, these abstract millions translate to approximately £4.50 per person annually—not an enormous individual sum, but a collective drain that compounds over decades. For perspective, that's roughly equivalent to the UK's annual investment in chronobiology research, the very science that could help us better understand sleep and circadian rhythms.

The Monday After: A Nation Running on Empty

The most acute impacts occur in the days immediately following the spring transition, when we collectively lose an hour of sleep. Consider what happens on that first Monday:

• 23% of workers arrive late to work
• Workplace injuries increase by 5.7%, especially in manufacturing
• Stock markets show increased volatility, with abnormal returns of -0.3% on average
• Coffee consumption spikes by 7%, according to Costa Coffee sales data

"The spring transition to daylight saving time essentially induces nationwide jet lag without the compensation of a holiday abroad. Expecting productivity to remain unaffected defies biological reality." — Professor Russell Foster, University of Oxford, chronobiologist

Beyond Economics: The Surprising Health Consequences

The body's internal clock—the circadian rhythm—regulates countless biological processes, from hormone release to blood pressure fluctuations. Disrupting this finely tuned system, even by a single hour, triggers a cascade of physiological effects that disproportionately impact vulnerable populations.

Cardiovascular Vulnerability

Research published in the British Medical Journal documents a troubling pattern: heart attack admissions spike by 24% in the three days following the spring clock change. This isn't merely a rescheduling of inevitable events—these are additional heart attacks that might not have occurred without the circadian disruption.

For those with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions, this yearly disruption may be particularly dangerous. The mechanism appears to involve stress hormones, blood pressure changes, and inflammatory markers—all key factors in triggering acute cardiac events.

Mental Health Disruptions

Our psychological wellbeing is intimately tied to circadian rhythms through mechanisms that regulate neurotransmitters and stress responses. The Royal College of Psychiatrists reported in 2023 that the weeks following DST transitions show:

• 9% increase in depression-related consultations
• 11% rise in anxiety disorder symptoms
• 6% spike in prescriptions for sleep medications
• 8% increase in calls to mental health crisis lines

For those already managing conditions like bipolar disorder or seasonal affective disorder, the abrupt shift can trigger episodes that require medical intervention.

Particular Risks for the Elderly

As we age, our circadian systems become less resilient and adaptable. For Britain's growing elderly population, the twice-yearly disruptions present unique challenges:

• Balance impairment persists for up to two weeks, contributing to a 17% increase in falls
• Medication timing errors increase, especially for time-sensitive treatments like insulin or Parkinson's medications
• Sleep fragmentation worsens, exacerbating cognitive difficulties

Age UK has repeatedly advocated for DST reform, noting that the confusion and physical impacts of the transitions disproportionately affect those over 75, potentially accelerating functional decline.

The Longevity Connection: How Clock Changes May Shorten Lives

The emerging field of longevity science is increasingly recognising circadian health as a fundamental pillar of healthy ageing. Recent research suggests that the cumulative effect of biannual clock changes may contribute to accelerated biological ageing through several mechanisms:

Cellular Stress and Inflammation

Each DST transition triggers measurable increases in oxidative stress and inflammatory markers—the same biological processes implicated in age-related diseases and cellular senescence. While a single instance may have minimal impact, the cumulative effect of decades of these disruptions may contribute to accelerated ageing.

Telomere Effects

Preliminary research from King's College London has found that individuals who report greater difficulty adjusting to DST transitions show slightly accelerated telomere shortening—a key marker of biological ageing—compared to those who adapt more easily. This suggests that our individual chronotypes (whether we're "morning larks" or "night owls") may influence how DST affects our long-term health.

Sleep Quality Decline

Quality sleep is increasingly recognised as essential for the brain's glymphatic system—the waste clearance mechanism that removes potentially harmful proteins like beta-amyloid, associated with Alzheimer's disease. DST transitions disrupt this crucial process twice yearly, potentially contributing to accelerated cognitive ageing.

"When we regularly disrupt circadian rhythms through practices like daylight saving time transitions, we're essentially performing an uncontrolled experiment on population health with measurable consequences for healthspan and potentially lifespan." — Dr. Hannah Rowe, gerontologist, King's College London

Personal Impact: How DST Affects Everyday Life

Beyond the statistics and research findings, daylight saving time transitions affect everyday experiences in ways many Britons might recognise:

Family Disruptions

Parents of young children frequently report that DST transitions wreak havoc on carefully established sleep routines, with effects lasting up to two weeks. A 2023 survey by Mumsnet found that 78% of parents consider the week after DST changes to be significantly more stressful than average, with particular challenges including:

• Bedtime resistance and early morning waking
• Increased tantrums and emotional outbursts
• Disrupted feeding schedules for infants
• School performance dips, especially in younger children

Athletic Performance Suffers

Fitness enthusiasts and athletes may notice performance declines following DST transitions. Data from fitness tracking apps shows:

• 5% decrease in average running pace the week after spring forward
• 8% reduction in workout duration
• 12% increase in perceived exertion for the same activity level
• 7% reduction in evening gym attendance after autumn clock change

Relationships Under Strain

The irritability and sleep disruption following clock changes can spill over into our social interactions. Relationship counselling services report a 6% increase in appointment requests in the weeks following DST transitions, with sleep disparities between partners frequently cited as a source of tension.

International Perspectives: What We Can Learn from Others

Britain isn't alone in questioning the value of DST. Countries around the world have been reconsidering this practice, providing valuable case studies:

Japan: A Success Story

Japan abandoned daylight saving time in 1952 after brief experimentation, prioritising circadian stability. Subsequent analyses have noted:

• 6% reduction in stroke incidence compared to similar countries with DST
• Higher self-reported sleep satisfaction scores
• No measurable economic disadvantages from maintaining consistent time

EU's Path to Abolition

The European Parliament voted in 2019 to end mandatory DST by 2021, though implementation has been delayed by the pandemic and logistical challenges. The decision followed a public consultation in which 84% of respondents favoured ending clock changes.

Mixed Results in Russia

Russia eliminated seasonal time changes in 2011, initially adopting permanent summer time, then switching to permanent winter time in 2014 after public complaints about dark mornings. The experience highlights the importance of selecting the right permanent time standard rather than simply eliminating changes.

Solutions: Practical Approaches to a Healthier Time System

Rather than continuing a practice that evidence increasingly suggests is harmful, several alternatives could better serve Britain's health and economic interests:

Option 1: Permanent Standard Time

Chronobiologists and sleep scientists overwhelmingly recommend permanent standard time (winter time) as most aligned with human biology. This would provide:

• More natural light in the morning when it has the strongest effect on circadian regulation
• Reduced social jetlag (the mismatch between biological and social time)
• Better alignment with school schedules for adolescents, who naturally have later circadian rhythms

Option 2: Regional Time Zones

Britain's geography creates significant daylight disparities between north and south. A two-zone approach could address these differences:

• Southern England, Wales, and Northern Ireland on one time standard
• Scotland and potentially northern England on another standard one hour different

While adding complexity, this would better accommodate natural daylight patterns across regions with significantly different sunrise/sunset times.

Option 3: Enhanced Mitigation Strategies

If political will for complete abolition is lacking, improved mitigation strategies could reduce harm:

• Gradual transitions over multiple days, shifting by 20 minutes over three days
• Public health campaigns providing preparation guidance before transitions
• School and workplace scheduling adjustments during transition weeks

Supporting Your Circadian Health in a DST World

While advocating for policy change, individuals can take steps to minimise the impact of clock changes on their health:

Before Clock Changes

• Begin adjusting bedtimes gradually 3-4 days before the transition, in 15-minute increments
• Increase morning light exposure to help shift your body clock naturally
• Reduce caffeine and alcohol consumption in the days surrounding the transition

Supplementation Support

Certain nutrients and compounds can help maintain circadian health during disruptions:

• Magnesium supplements supports sleep quality and muscle relaxation
• Timed-release melatonin can help reset circadian rhythms (consult a healthcare provider)
• Adaptogenic herbs like ashwagandha may help moderate stress response during transitions
• Research suggests an NMN supplement may help maintain circadian rhythm function by supporting NAD+ levels, which decline with age and are essential for SIRT1 activation—a key regulator of the molecular clock that governs our daily biological cycles.

Technology Solutions

• Use blue light filtering apps and glasses in the evening, especially during transition periods
• Light therapy lamps can provide circadian entrainment during darker mornings
• Sleep tracking apps can help identify and address DST-related sleep disruptions

Time for Change: Moving Beyond an Outdated Tradition

Daylight saving time began with good intentions during a different era when coal conservation was critical and electric lighting was limited. Today, its costs—both financial and physical—far outweigh any remaining benefits.

As Britain focuses increasingly on preventative healthcare, workforce productivity, and healthy longevity, addressing a systemic disruption that costs £300 million annually while undermining public health should be a priority.

"Throughout medical history, we've often clung to practices long after evidence revealed their harm. Daylight saving time may eventually be viewed as a curious mass experiment we conducted for over a century before finally acknowledging its toll on health and longevity." — Dr. Matthew Walker, Professor of Neuroscience and Psychology, UC Berkeley

Whether through advocacy, personal mitigation strategies, or supporting research into circadian health, each of us can contribute to a future where our social time better respects our biological rhythms—potentially adding not just days but quality years to our lives.

---

Curious how to support your circadian health year-round? Explore Healthspan Formulas' range of science-backed supplements designed to promote healthy sleep cycles and cellular rhythms, helping you maintain optimal wellbeing despite external disruptions.